Showing posts with label Tunbridge Wells. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tunbridge Wells. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 September 2016

I need more time, or is that an excuse?


Last month I wrote about taking August off to write. It didn't go quite according to plan and I'm wondering if that's because I'm not dedicated enough to my writing. Maybe I'm not really a writer, deep inside? Do I need to be more single-minded, more disciplined? More obsessed?

A writer I respect once told me that writing must come first, always. It took me years to get over her dictum because I knew that a sad child or an ill partner would always come first for me, so I believed I couldn't be a proper writer.

The thing is, that life has a tendency of happening at you even if your main character is teetering on the brink and desperately needs you to write the next scene.

Real though my characters are to me, they don't die if I ignore them for a few weeks. They just get a bit pale and I get frustrated.

So here's what happened with my glorious month off. I spent the first two weeks of it sorting out family stuff that popped up the moment I cleared my desk. Very neat timing, very frustrating, but needs must.

Or must they? I'm willing to bet that Virginia Woolf and James Joyce and all those people I think of as serious writers didn't abandon their manuscripts for weeks while they drove around the country sorting out care packages, or interrogating GPs, or comforting someone whose life's about to change completely.  Or, come to that, buying the weekly shop and cooking the evening meals.

The thing is, these things I do are part of me, so they're also part of me as a writer. I don't write domestic dramas, but I do write stories with people in them and everything I do feeds my writing.

The problem is finding time and space to think about my story and put the resulting words on the page.

Not writing for those first two weeks of August was awful. I got angry. I felt bad about being angry but I'm just not going to write a novel when someone I love is struggling. In the third week of August though, things calmed down and I wrote and wrote.

Then I had one week left. Just one week - I'd hoped to finish my first draft over the summer and there was no way, absolutely no way I could do that. What's more my house would be full of people, and I'd never be able to concentrate - I wanted to be able to wander around talking to myself, lie on the floor to think, write at midnight or ten in the morning, whatever it took. So I took a deep breath, rented a flat in Hastings for four days, and caught the train with a bag holding my laptop and a swimming costume, and told my family that I was running away.

I think they understood. My family is a lovely family.


Hastings was heaven. I wrote, I thought, I wrote and I thought. I swam and walked up the cliffs. I slept after breakfast and dreamed of my characters and no one interrupted them. I talked to no one except some old friends with whom I had supper one night, and Deborah behind the bar of the Crown pub opposite, who made me excellent coffee each morning. That's all the human contact I needed.

I'm back now, and working again. But a month away from my desk - even if half of it wasn't spent writing - has given me a fresh determination to finish my novel. I took a couple of hours off yesterday to write and I'll do the same today.

That's a piece of chocolate and Guinness cake, by the way, and some of the best coffee Tunbridge Wells can provide. Thank you Black Dog café, top writing spot of yesterday.

The thing is, I suspect that writing slow suits me. I've only just understood my second main character's motivation. I began to see it last week while watching a bunch of people at a neighbouring breakfast table in a conference centre play power over their muesli. I spent the next few days driving up and down the country listening to old, old music, with that scene simmering in my mind. It's on the page now, transplanted and transformed and I know what's happening in my story far better. Sometimes a good story just takes time, and I'm ok with that.


Friday, 20 May 2011

Printing an onion

Last night I went into TW to a printing workshop. I love looking at prints and wanted to  know how they are made - I've only done monoprinting before (apart from the time I sliced my hand open as a child trying to linoprint).

We started with colograph printing - inking objects like leaves, feathers, cuts-outs from textured wallpaper, placing them on a sheet of paper, and then passing them through a press so that the ink from the objects was transferred onto a clean sheet of paper. It's quite like monograph printing in a way. I used leaves, and cut out leaf shapes from wallpaper, orange netting and a plastic label.

I added green tissue paper, thinking of leaves landing on flowing water.
But I got muddled and half the tissue paper ended up stuck to the underside of the leaves.
 
 
 
 
 
 


We spent the second half of the evening trying dry point etching, which is what I was really interested in seeing done. I'm mesmerised by the detail some artists cram into an etching, and by the confidence of their lines, when one slip means a whole plate is ruined.

I brought along a photo of an onion I'd taken at home, and sat paralysed before my perspex plate. I'm not by any stretch of the imagination an artist, and drawing is not something I'm comfortable with at the best of times, even with a pencil and a rubber - so etching was intimidating.
 
Once you've finished etching, you put a small dab of ink on a large sheet of perspex, or two if you want to mix colours, and then scrape it thinly over your etching. Once it's all covered, wipe/dab it off with a pounce - a mushroom of hard scrim (rough cloth) and then another of soft scrim. Such splendid names!

On my first run through the press I used red ink, and realised my onion was flat and lacking in detail , so I added more screetches, re-inked in black, and ran the print through the machine again.

It still seemed rather two-dimensional so I added more lines and did a fresh print in black. It's still not a masterpiece, but I'm quite pleased at my first attempt!









 The thing I really came to understand is that printmaking is about layers - you see the object before you, and you recreate it on the plate, but the plate is a hidden stage in the process - it's a means to an end, and never gets seen by anyone other than the artist. And because the process of printing means passing what you've created through a mechanism of some kind (whether a simple roller or a complex press), the artist's hand is quite distant from the finished piece. I guess maybe it's the same for a writer - when you see the story in print, it's fixed, and has somehow moved away from the thing it was in your head and in your fingers as you wrote it down.

Our excellent tutors were Lindsay Connors http://www.lc-art.co.uk/ and Niki Campbell http://www.niki-campbell.co.uk/ both of whom made beautiful prints for the TW museum re-collections exhibition where writers and artists drew on the hidden collections in the basement http://www.re-collections.org.uk/index.html